Transpalpebral mini-orbitozygomatic approach for nonvascular skull base lesions: a single neurosurgeon's experience.

OBJECTIVE: The authors aim to describe the advantages, utility, and disadvantages of the transpalpebral mini-orbitozygomatic (MOZ) approach for tumors of the lateral and superior orbit, orbital apex, anterior clinoid, anterior cranial fossa, middle cranial fossa, and parasellar region. METHODS: The surgical approach from skin incision to closure is described while highlighting key technical and anatomical considerations, and cadaveric dissection demonstrates the surgical steps and focuses on important anatomy. Intraoperative images were included to supplement the cadaveric dissection. A retrospective review of adults who had undergone the MOZ approach for nonvascular pathology performed by a single neurosurgeon from 2017 to 2023 was included in this institutional review board-approved study. Descriptive statistics was used to summarize the data. Four representative cases were included to demonstrate the utility of the MOZ approach. RESULTS: The study included 65 patients (46 female, 19 male), average age 54.84 years, who had undergone transpalpebral MOZ surgery. Presenting symptoms included visual changes (53.8% of cases), vision loss (23.1%), diplopia (21.8%), and proptosis (13.8%). The optic nerve and optic chiasm were involved in 32.3% and 10.8% of cases, respectively. The most common pathology was meningioma (81.5% of cases), and gross-total resection was achieved in 50% of all cases. Major complications included an infection and a carotid injury. Improvement of preoperative symptoms was reported in 92.2% of cases. Visual acuity improved in 12 patients. The mean follow-up was 8.57 ± 8.45 months. CONCLUSIONS: The MOZ approach is safe and durable. The transpalpebral incision provides better cosmesis and functional outcomes than those of standard anterolateral approaches to the skull base. Careful consideration of the limits of the approach is paramount to appropriate application on a case-by-case basis. Further quantitative anatomical studies can help to define and compare the utility of the approach to open cranio-orbital and endoscopic transorbital approaches.

Intraventricular Tumors: Surgical Considerations in Lateral and Third Ventricular Tumors.

Management of lateral and third ventricular tumors has been a challenge for neurosurgeons. Advances in imaging and pathology have helped in a better understanding of the treatment options. Technical refinement of microsurgical technique and addition of endoscopy has enabled more radical excision of tumors, when indicated, and added more safety.A proper understanding of the pathology at various ages and treatment options is continuously evolving. Many pediatric tumors are amenable to conservative surgical methods with effective complementary treatments. However, radical surgery is required in many adults as the main treatment and for many benign tumors. Various intraventricular lesions encountered and their surgical management is reviewed here for their efficacy, safety, and outcome, encompassing changes in our practice over the last 20 years.

Clipping of Anterior Circulation Aneurysms: Operative Instructions and Safety Rules for Young Cerebrovascular Surgeons.

INTRODUCTION: Due to the constant development of the technique, in the last 30 years, the endovascular treatment of the intracranial aneurysms (IAs) has gradually superseded the traditional surgery in the majority of centers. However, clipping still represents the best treatment for some anterior circulation IAs according to their angioarchitectural, topographical, and hemodynamic characteristics. Thus, the identification of residual indications for clipping and the maintenance of training programs in vascular neurosurgery appear nowadays more important than ever. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed our last 10-year institutional experience of ruptured and unruptured IAs clipping. We appraised in detail all technical refinements we adopted during this time span and analyzed the difficulties we met in teaching the aneurysm clipping technique to residents and fellows. Then, we described the algorithm of safety rules we used to teach young neurosurgeons how to surgical approach anterior circulation IAs and develop a procedural memory, which may intervene in all emergency situations. RESULTS: We identified seven pragmatic technical key points for clipping of the most frequent anterior circulation IAs and constructed a didactic approach to teach young cerebrovascular surgeons. In general, they concern craniotomy; cisternostomy; obtaining proximal control; cranial nerve, perforator, and vein preservation; necessity of specific corticectomy; aneurysm neck dissection; and clipping. CONCLUSION: In the setting of an IA clipping, particularly when ruptured, the young cerebrovascular surgeon needs to respect an algorithm of safety rules, which are essential not only to avoid major complications, but they may intervene during the difficulties helping to manage potentially life-tethering conditions.

neuroGPT-X: toward a clinic-ready large language model.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to assess the performance of a context-enriched large language model (LLM) compared with international neurosurgical experts on questions related to the management of vestibular schwannoma. Furthermore, another objective was to develop a chat-based platform incorporating in-text citations, references, and memory to enable accurate, relevant, and reliable information in real time. METHODS: The analysis involved 1) creating a data set through web scraping, 2) developing a chat-based platform called neuroGPT-X, 3) enlisting 8 expert neurosurgeons across international centers to independently create questions (n = 1) and to answer (n = 4) and evaluate responses (n = 3) while blinded, and 4) analyzing the evaluation results on the management of vestibular schwannoma. In the blinded phase, all answers were assessed for accuracy, coherence, relevance, thoroughness, speed, and overall rating. All experts were unblinded and provided their thoughts on the utility and limitations of the tool. In the unblinded phase, all neurosurgeons provided answers to a Likert scale survey and long-answer questions regarding the clinical utility, likelihood of use, and limitations of the tool. The tool was then evaluated on the basis of a set of 103 consensus statements on vestibular schwannoma care from the 8th Quadrennial International Conference on Vestibular Schwannoma. RESULTS: Responses from the naive and context-enriched Generative Pretrained Transformer (GPT) models were consistently rated not significantly different in terms of accuracy, coherence, relevance, thoroughness, and overall performance, and they were often rated significantly higher than expert responses. Both the naive and content-enriched GPT models provided faster responses to the standardized question set than expert neurosurgeon respondents (p < 0.01). The context-enriched GPT model agreed with 98 of the 103 (95%) consensus statements. Of interest, all expert surgeons expressed concerns about the reliability of GPT in accurately addressing the nuances and controversies surrounding the management of vestibular schwannoma. Furthermore, the authors developed neuroGPT-X, a chat-based platform designed to provide point-of-care clinical support and mitigate the limitations of human memory. neuroGPT-X incorporates features such as in-text citations and references to enable accurate, relevant, and reliable information in real time. CONCLUSIONS: The present study, with its subspecialist-level performance in generating written responses to complex neurosurgical problems for which evidence-based consensus for management is lacking, suggests that context-enriched LLMs show promise as a point-of-care medical resource. The authors anticipate that this work will be a springboard for expansion into more medical specialties, incorporating evidence-based clinical information and developing expert-level dialogue surrounding LLMs in healthcare.

Sanford Larson, MD, PhD: a pioneering neurosurgeon, scientist, and educator.

Dr. Sanford Larson, MD, PhD (1929-2012), was an influential figure in spinal neurosurgery. Dr. Larson played a pivotal role in establishing neurosurgery's foothold in spinal surgery by serving as the inaugural chair of the Joint Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves and as a president of the Cervical Spine Research Society. He made many advances in spine care, most notably the modification and popularization of the lateral extracavitary approach to the thoracolumbar spine. Dr. Larson established the neurosurgery residency program at the Medical College of Wisconsin; he also instituted the program's spine fellowship, the first in the United States for neurological surgeons. His mentorship produced numerous leaders in organized neurosurgery and neurosurgical education, including Edward Benzel, MD, Dennis Maiman, MD, PhD, Joseph Cheng, MD, Shekar Kurpad, MD, PhD, and Christopher Wolfla, MD. Dr. Larson was a prominent leader in spinal neurosurgery and his legacy carries on today through his contributions to research, education, and surgical technique.

Successful adaptation of twinning concept for global neurosurgery collaborations-a validation study.

INTRODUCTION: Globally, many regions have an urgent, unmet need of neurosurgical care. A multi-step neurosurgical twinning technique, International Neurosurgical Twinning Modeled for Africa (INTIMA), was proved to be successful during a previous mission to Neurosurgical Unit, Enugu, Nigeria. The Swedish African Neurosurgical Collaboration (SANC) performed a developmental mission together with the local neurosurgical unit in The Gambia, adopting the INTIMA model. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team visited for a 2-week collaborative mission at the Neurosurgical Department of the Edward Francis Small Teaching Hospital in Banjul, The Gambia. The mission followed the data of neurosurgical operations during and after the mission as well as about the operations 3 months prior to and after the mission was collected. RESULTS: During the mission, a total of 22 operations was carried out, the most common being degenerative spinal conditions (n = 9). In the 3 months following the mission, 43 operations were performed compared to 24 during the 3 months leading up to the mission. The complexity of the performed procedures increased after the mission. An operating microscope (Möller-Wedel) was donated and installed and the neurosurgeons on site underwent training in microneurosurgery. The surgical nurses, nurses at the postoperative ward, and the physiotherapists underwent training. A biomedical engineer serviced multiple appliances and devices improving the patient care on site while training local technicians. CONCLUSION: This study validated the use of the INTIMA model previously described in a mission by Swedish African Neurosurgical Collaboration (SANC). The model is sustainable and produces notable results. The core strength of the model is in the multidisciplinary team securing all the aspects and steps of the neurosurgical care. Installation of an operating microscope opened for further microsurgical possibilities, improving the neurosurgical care in The Gambia.

Alfred Washington Adson: Perspectives on Intracranial Neurosurgery and the Responsibilities of the Neurosurgeon.

In a period when the budding field of neurosurgery was believed to have little promise, Dr Alfred Washington Adson founded and led the first neurosurgical department at Mayo Clinic. He was not without reservations-surgical intervention for neurological conditions was rarely pursued because of poor outcomes and high complication rates, and Dr Adson acknowledged his early concerns about the future of neurosurgery in his memoirs. However, his education, mentorship, his training, and his first neurosurgical cases helped to shape the impact he ultimately had on the field and his legacy as a neurosurgeon. Dr Adson trained with several renowned Mayo general surgeons, notably his mentor Dr Emil Beckman, whose desire for operative precision shaped Dr Adson's drive to develop his own skills as a surgeon. Two years into his residency, he became the youngest staff surgeon and was tasked with managing the neurosurgical cases at Mayo. The five neurosurgical cases overseen by Dr Adson in the next year illuminated the opportunity for neurosurgery to drastically improve the lives of patients. Dr Adson, given the option of continuing as either a general surgeon or a neurosurgeon, ultimately chose to pursue neurosurgery. This article seeks to provide a historical perspective on the neurosurgeon Dr Alfred Washington Adson using primary and secondary accounts from the Mayo archives, highlighting his contributions to the early understanding of intracranial pathology and how his early experiences as a trainee developed into a personal passion for self-improvement, education, and advocacy for health care in America.

Intraoperative ultrasound for surgical resection of high-grade glioma and glioblastoma: a meta-analysis of 732 patients.

PURPOSE: Here, we conducted a meta-analysis to explore the use of intraoperative ultrasound (iUS)-guided resection in patients diagnosed with high-grade glioma (HGG) or glioblastoma (GBM). Our aim was to determine whether iUS improves clinical outcomes compared to conventional neuronavigation (CNN). METHODS: Databases were searched until April 21, 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational cohort studies that compared surgical outcomes for patients with HGG or GBM with the use of either iUS in addition to standard approach or CNN. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes include volumetric extent of resection (EOR), gross total resection (GTR), and progression-free survival (PFS). Outcomes were analyzed by determining pooled relative risk ratios (RR), mean difference (MD), and standardized mean difference (SMD) using random-effects model. RESULTS: Of the initial 867 articles, only 7 articles specifically met the inclusion criteria (1 RCT and 6 retrospective cohorts). The analysis included 732 patients. Compared to CNN, the use of iUS was associated with higher OS (SMD = 0.26,95%CI=[0.12,0.39]) and GTR (RR = 2.02; 95% CI=[1.31,3.1]) for both HGG and GBM. There was no significant difference in PFS or EOR. CONCLUSION: The use of iUS in surgical resections for HGG and GBM can improve OS and GTR compared to CNN, but it did not affect PFS. These results suggest that iUS reduces mortality associated with HGG and GBM but not the risk of recurrence. These results can provide valuable cost-effective interventions for neurosurgeons in HGG and GBM surgery.

Chat-GPT on brain tumors: An examination of Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning's ability to provide diagnoses and treatment plans for example neuro-oncology cases.

OBJECTIVE: Assess the capabilities of ChatGPT-3.5 and 4 to provide accurate diagnoses, treatment options, and treatment plans for brain tumors in example neuro-oncology cases. METHODS: ChatGPT-3.5 and 4 were provided with twenty example neuro-oncology cases of brain tumors, all selected from medical textbooks. The artificial intelligence programs were asked to give a diagnosis, treatment option, and treatment plan for each of these twenty example cases. Team members first determined in which cases ChatGPT-3.5 and 4 provided the correct diagnosis or treatment plan. Twenty neurosurgeons from the researchers' institution then independently rated the diagnoses, treatment options, and treatment plans provided by both artificial intelligence programs for each of the twenty example cases, on a scale of one to ten, with ten being the highest score. To determine whether the difference between the scores of ChatGPT-3.5 and 4 was statistically significant, a paired t-test was conducted for the average scores given to the programs for each example case. RESULTS: In the initial analysis of correct responses, ChatGPT-4 had an accuracy of 85% for its diagnoses of example brain tumors and an accuracy of 75% for its provided treatment plans, while ChatGPT-3.5 only had an accuracy of 65% and 10%, respectively. The average scores given by the twenty independent neurosurgeons to ChatGPT-4 for its accuracy of diagnosis, provided treatment options, and provided treatment plan were 8.3, 8.4, and 8.5 out of 10, respectively, while ChatGPT-3.5's average scores for these categories of assessment were 5.9, 5.7, and 5.7. These differences in average score are statistically significant on a paired t-test, with a p-value of less than 0.001 for each difference. CONCLUSIONS: ChatGPT-4 demonstrates great promise as a diagnostic tool for brain tumors in neuro-oncology, as attested to by the program's performance in this study and its assessment by surveyed neurosurgeon reviewers.

Indian Neurosurgeons at the Forefront: A Comprehensive Exploration of their Pioneering Contributions to Neuroendoscopy.

This article delves into the profound impact of Indian neurosurgeons on the expansive canvas of neuroendoscopy. By scrutinizing their trailblazing research, innovations, new surgical techniques, and relentless dedication to education and training, we aim to unravel the intricacies of their influence on a global scale. The review, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, conducts a comprehensive analysis of the literature related to neuroendoscopy contributed by Indian neurosurgeons. The exploration covers a spectrum of achievements, ranging from pioneering research and innovations to complication avoidance, neuroendoscopic training, and global recognition. Despite challenges, Indian neurosurgeons continue to lead the way in shaping the future of neuroendoscopy, ensuring better patient outcomes and improved quality of life. Many Indian neurosurgeons have contributed significantly to the development of neuroendoscopy in India. Prof. YR Yadav's contributions stand significant in the form of research articles and publications on almost all subjects on neuroendoscopy, the textbook on neuroendoscopy, popularizing neuroendoscopy by starting the first university-certified neuroendoscopy fellowship training program in India, describing many innovative techniques/first report of endoscopic techniques and conducting regular endoscopic workshops in his institutions and other major cities of India.

[New Preoperative Simulations for the Future of Hydrocephalus Surgery].

Ventricular puncture is a basic procedure that neurosurgeons learn in the early stages of their careers and is also performed in ventricular drainage and neuroendoscopic surgery. However, few neurosurgeons are confident in their ability to insert and place a ventricular catheter in the optimal position for ventriculoperitoneal(VP)shunting in a single pass. Even experienced neurosurgical consultants confident in difficult microsurgical procedures are uncomfortable with ventricular catheter placement in VP shunting. Moreover, many neurosurgeons believe that they will never perform a ventricular puncture from the posterior horn of the lateral ventricles. The reason for thinking that ventricular puncture via the anterior horn is safer and more accurate compared with the posterior approach is because the anterior approach can use facial landmarks such as eyes, nose, and ears. However, even with the anterior approach in VP shunting, it is more difficult than with ventricular drainage or neuroendoscopic surgery to achieve accurate placement owing to head rotation, and the success rate has been reported to be as high as 50%. In this article, I introduced "fool proof," which uses preoperative simulation to place a ventricular catheter in the optimal position according to the size and shape of each patient's head and ventricles. The first choice for VP shunting is the right parieto-occipital approach with a posterior horn puncture from Frazier's Point and, for L-P shunting, a paramedian puncture from the 2/3 or 3/4 lumbar interspace.

Giant Aneurysms: Not So Giant in Behavior.

BACKGROUND: Giant intracranial aneurysms (GIAs) are very complex in their behavior and treatment procedure. There are various modalities of treatment. The annual rupture rate of GIA (6%) is higher than that of small aneurysms (1-3%). Neurosurgeons handle these aneurysms during operations. OBJECTIVE: We tried to analyze the intraoperative rupture rate (IRR) of GIA in relation to small aneurysms. IRR is concerned with the rupture of the aneurysms during operative handling. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For conducting the study, we compared the IRR of 7 GIAs and 45 small aneurysms during a span of 10 years. All the operations were performed by the same team and the same principal surgeon. IRR was compared by statistical analysis. RESULT: Z-test was done to compare the two rates: Z = 0.68 and P = 0.49. According to our study, the IRR of GIA is not statistically different from small aneurysms. The IRR of GIA is not higher because of three factors which we have analyzed: 1) layers of intraaneurysmal thrombus, 2) fibrin deposition on the aneurysm wall, and 3) blocked neck of the aneurysm by thrombus. CONCLUSION: The IRR of GIA is not different from small aneurysms.

hglobal-Index: A Novel Author-Level Measure of the Diffusion of Scientific Ideas Among High-, Low-, and Middle-Income Countries.

OBJECTIVE: To describe an intuitive and useful method for measuring the global impact of a medical scholar's research ideas by examining cross-border citations (CBCs) of peer-reviewed neurosurgical publications. METHODS: Publication and citation data for a random sample of the top 50 most academically productive neurosurgeons were obtained from Scopus Application Programming Interface. We characterized an author-level global impact index analogous to the widely used h-index, the hglobal-index, defined as the number of published peer-reviewed manuscripts with at least the same number of CBCs. To uncover socioeconomic insights, we explored the hglobal-index for high-, middle-, and low-income countries. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range) number of publications and CBCs were 144 (62-255) and 2704 (959-5325), respectively. The median (interquartile range) h-index and hglobal-index were 42 (23-61) and 32 (17-38), respectively. Compared with neurosurgeons in the random sample, the 3 global neurosurgeons had the highest hglobal-indices in low-income countries at 17, 13, and 9, despite below-average h-index scores of 33, 38, and 19, respectively. CONCLUSION: This intuitive update to the h-index uses CBCs to measure the global impact of scientific research. The hglobal-index may provide insight into global diffusion of medical ideas, which can be used for social science research, author self-assessment, and academic promotion.

Evaluating the clinical utility of artificial intelligence assistance and its explanation on the glioma grading task.

Clinical evaluation evidence and model explainability are key gatekeepers to ensure the safe, accountable, and effective use of artificial intelligence (AI) in clinical settings. We conducted a clinical user-centered evaluation with 35 neurosurgeons to assess the utility of AI assistance and its explanation on the glioma grading task. Each participant read 25 brain MRI scans of patients with gliomas, and gave their judgment on the glioma grading without and with the assistance of AI prediction and explanation. The AI model was trained on the BraTS dataset with 88.0% accuracy. The AI explanation was generated using the explainable AI algorithm of SmoothGrad, which was selected from 16 algorithms based on the criterion of being truthful to the AI decision process. Results showed that compared to the average accuracy of 82.5±8.7% when physicians performed the task alone, physicians' task performance increased to 87.7±7.3% with statistical significance (p-value = 0.002) when assisted by AI prediction, and remained at almost the same level of 88.5±7.0% (p-value = 0.35) with the additional assistance of AI explanation. Based on quantitative and qualitative results, the observed improvement in physicians' task performance assisted by AI prediction was mainly because physicians' decision patterns converged to be similar to AI, as physicians only switched their decisions when disagreeing with AI. The insignificant change in physicians' performance with the additional assistance of AI explanation was because the AI explanations did not provide explicit reasons, contexts, or descriptions of clinical features to help doctors discern potentially incorrect AI predictions. The evaluation showed the clinical utility of AI to assist physicians on the glioma grading task, and identified the limitations and clinical usage gaps of existing explainable AI techniques for future improvement.